Participative learning, collaborative working, audience led content – events are changing, and for the better. But with this shift to more involved formats there’s a danger that we alienate a large part of the audience.
Introversion is a preference for reflective, minimally stimulating environments. Shyness is very different it’s a fear of negative judgment. And, as she points out here, there are many shy extroverts.
As conferences shout about ‘speed networking’ and ‘rocket pitches’ a growing number of people quietly decline to attend. In the world of internal communications, where attendance is often mandatory, these formats can cause real stress (I’ve heard people talk about being physically sick before having to go to an event that simply hasn’t been designed with them in mind).
Should we abandon all thoughts of participation for fear of appealing to only the most unabashed of extroverts? The answer is definitely not.
Firstly, it is a myth to suggest that introverted audiences don’t value participative formats. And, secondly, the fundamental value of people coming together at conferences isn’t in pushing information (that’s what the internet is good at) but in sharing ideas, pollinating new thinking, starting conversations – all things that are best done participative.
So how can we design participative events that don’t alienate huge swathes of our audience?
Recent Comments